Jan 15, 2013

LINCOLN RE-SHOT.


The movie opens with a Union soldier strangling a Confederate soldier who is bayoneting a Union soldier who is gouging the eyes out of a Confederate soldier. They get off the subway and start fighting the Civil War.      

THE CAPITOL BUILDING. Congress is in session. A bullfrog in a frock coat (Tommy Lee Jones) takes the floor and commences a stirring peroration against the evils of slavery. Every time he uses the word, “enfranchisement,” the Southern senators leap to their feet, scream and shake their fists. Secretary of State Charles Seward (David Strathairn) leans over to Secretary of War Edwin Stanton (Bruce McGill) and asks, 
  “Why do they hate the word, ‘enfranchisement?’” 
“It means giving Negroes the right to vote.”
“I thought it meant owning a MacDonald’s.”                                                        

THE WHITE HOUSE. In the Lincoln Bedroom (which was, then, just the bedroom) Abraham Lincoln is talking to a golf umbrella, which, upon closer inspection, turns out to be his wife, Mary Todd Lincoln (Sally Field) in a crinoline wider than she is tall.
“You know those splitting headaches I always get,” she says, “I find that they begin when you arrive and stop when you leave.” 
“What a coincidence,” he replies, “the same is true for the pain in my ass!”
          THE WHITE HOUSE. In the Oval Office, a man who could be Mark Twain’s grandfather (Hal Holbrook) tells President Lincoln, in the greatest confidence, that the Confederacy is willing to begin peace talks. 
“They want to surrender?” Lincoln says, brightening.
“No, negotiate.”
“Like one country to another? That’s crazy.”
“Do you want this war to end?”
“Yeah, when all the Confederates die or they surrender. Whichever comes first.” 
“You take a hard line.”
“There’s a reason I give my best speeches in cemeteries.”                                        

WHITE HOUSE. Later that night, Abraham Lincoln talks with his 
oldest son, Robert (Joseph Gordon-Levitt)
“Pa, I want to enlist.”
“Do you want to die?”
“I want to serve my country.”
“You can’t serve it with a Confederate bayonet up your hoo-ha.”
“Everyone I know is in uniform.”
“They’re either soldiers or slaves. Neither of whom has a choice. You’re one of the rare – and lucky – people who do.”
“Then I’m making my choice. I choose to enlist.”
“Just kill me, instead. Take this gun and shoot me in the back of my head. Put me out of my misery.”  
“Ma said I could do it.”
“Really? Your mother said you could join the army? Why do I doubt that?”                           

THE WHITE HOUSE. The President and Secretary of State confer in the Oval Office.
“Tell me, Charles, how close are we to passing an amendment abolishing slavery?”
“We need ten more votes, Mr. President.”
“How do we get them? I assume you’ve already asked nicely.”
“Voting in favor of the amendment could cost these men the next election. They’ll need a lot of persuading.”
“Hmmm. If we can’t get ten more votes, what if we had ten less opposing votes.”
“How do we do that?”
“We kill - ”
  “It will look bad.”
“No one has to know.”
“Ten empty seats will be obvious.”
“In that case, I know some men who are very good at persuading.”
“Short of killing.”
“If necessary.”
“I’m afraid I must insist, Mr. President.”                                                                            

THE CAPITOL BUILDING. Office of Representative Robert Latham. (R-West Va.) Young and impressionable, Mr. Latham (John Hawkes) doesn’t need much persuading. All it takes is the political operative, W.N. Bilbo, 
twisting his arm until Latham’s face is pinned against the desk.
“You don’t need this arm to vote. All you need is to say, yea.”
“I’ll do it. I’ll do it.”
“Do what?”
“Vote for the amendment.”
  Mr. Bilbo, by the way, looks like James Spader, only blown up with a pump and tied closed with a mustache.                                        

THE WHITE HOUSE. To provide plausible deniability,President Lincoln invites a variety of congressmen and cabinet members to the White House for brandy and cigars. While there, he regales them with the sort of homespun, corn-fed stories that prove what a regular guy he is.
“There was young man from Nantucket - ”                                                              

THE CAPITOL BUILDING. Congress votes and the amendment passes. The abolition of slavery is celebrated by Republicans (that’s how long ago it was) and bemoaned by Democrats. The former sing, “Battle Cry of Freedom,” the latter pack their carpetbags and begin planning Reconstruction.                                                      

THE WHITE HOUSE. Waiting alone for the results, Abraham Lincoln is a solitary sihouette, slumped in thought. Or worry. Or regret. Possibly all three. Finally, he hears church bells. First one, then more. They are tolling a new birth a freedom. Announcing his success. Crowning his work. He moves to the window and parts the drapes. The light is so strong, it threatens to consume him, but doesn’t. It humbles and exalts him at the same time. THE MOVIE ENDS. THIS IS WHERE IT SHOULD END – AND NOT A SECOND LATER.                                                                    

If you don’t know what happens next, look it up.

Anna Karenina (2012): Muddled Russia.


Leo Tolstoy’s novel, Anna Karenina, is a simple story: a love triangle that ends badly. How he got nine hundred pages out of it, I don’t know. I’ve never read the book. I’ve tried, but it is my Everest. (I’d say it’s my Moby Dick, but Moby Dick is my Moby Dick.) I’ve seen two movie versions of it, however, and, as far as I can tell, they’re no substitute. You would think one of the world’s great love stories would make a hell of a movie, yet the current one, directed by Joe Wright, is only hell. Why?                                                                                             

          First, casting: Anna has to be beautiful. Here’s where Wright gets it completely right. Keira Knightley is so beautiful that she even looks good through a veil. But he blows Vronsky (so to speak.) Count Vronsky must be 
so dashing and physically attractive that Anna, a respectable wife and mother, is overwhelmed with passion at the very sight of him. Yet, the actor he chose, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, looks like Gene Wilder in Young Frankenstein. Karenin, Anna’s husband, must be formidable and Jude Law does his best, but he’s made up to look like an accountant for Rasputin & Co.                                                         

Then, the conflict. Every drama must have it and Anna Karenina, both the character and the story, is rippling with it. Conflict between Anna and her husband, her society and within herself. All of which is intensified by being a woman in nineteenth century Russian society. Upper class, no less. In this version, it’s all underplayed. Karenin frowns and threatens, opera-goers sneer and the only indication of inner conflict is Anna’s early shunning of Vronsky and later embrace of morphine (in a bottle, by the way, big enough to stun the entire Russian army.) Nothing about her gender. Don’t think we’re supposed to assume that, either. (It’s very difficult to claim that without looking like you’re making excuses.) Mr. Wright, though, isn’t done with the Russian upper class. Not yet. That brings us to the theater.                        

The movie begins in a theater as if all the action will take place on stage. It doesn’t – and that’s a problem. The director has claimed that “theater” is a symbol for the artificial, restrictive and over-determined nature of high society in Moscow and St. Petersburg. Not a bad idea, but let’s give it a haircut. Suppose, instead of a theater, we compare society to a doll’s house. Hey, didn’t Henrik Ibsen write a play about that? Yeah. And he didn’t show a doll’s house! Going back to the theater, however, it doesn’t function as a frame for this story or the background or even a theme. In Wright’s Anna Karenina, it’s merely an interruption. Doubly a shame because he already has a powerful symbol that can serve all those functions, but neglects it:
dancing.                         
           Nineteenth Century beau monde, like dancing, depends on shared knowledge for smooth functioning. Everyone must know all the steps and do them exactly in time to the music. If as little as one person is out of step, ugliness and conflict results. Yet what does Joe Wright do with the fancy dress balls in his film? He catches their spectacle, but not their meaning.What about the scene where Anna Karenina dances in a black dress while everyone else is wearing white? Subtle. Makes you wonder what he’d do with Hawthorne’s Scarlet Letter. Not that you can’t shoot the same scene effectively. I’m thinking of another film based on an epic novel of love and death in the eighteen sixties. A beautiful and decidedly independent heroine shocks the local nabobs by the dancing in a black dress. In the case of Scarlet O’Hara, her widow’s weeds.                                                                      

You don’t have to go as far afield as Atlanta, Georgia or back to 1939 to see how well similar material can be handled. Elvira Madigan (1967) tells the story of a beautiful, Danish circus performer and her tragic love affair with a handsome cavalry officer. True, it’s no Gone With The Wind, but a lot of people can’t hear Mozart’s 21st Piano Concerto without thinking of that movie.          

The 1935 film of Anna Karenina is no masterpiece, either, but it looks like one in comparison. It reduces Tolstoy’s nine hundred pages to a brisk ninety minutes, but not a single one is wasted. It moves like a train (so to speak) from beginning to end.  Greta Garbo burns white-hot without losing any of her iciness and Frederick March is va-va voomsky. An even bigger irony, however, is that the screenwriter of the current Anna Karenina, Tom Stoppard, shares a name with . . . he is? Never mind.

Here Speaks One of Us.

I write not only for sophisticates,
For intellectuals with learned mates.
On frontiers wild, and even in far Britain,
Troops quote my epigrams with lips frost-bitten.
But this regard fills not my money pouch however I keep proving I'm no slouch.
They say this is a new Augustan age,
But no Maecenases support my page.

                                       Martial
                                       (40-102 AD)
                                       tr. Gary Wills