Nov 19, 2009

Sarah Palin Should Aim Low.

It’s painfully clear that Sarah Palin is unsuited for any form of government. She quit her last public office in mid-term to cash in on her celebrity, so her contempt for the people she serves is breathtaking. Her performance in the 2008 Republican Presidential campaign (otherwise known as the “Drag Me To Hell” Tour) leaves no doubt about her ignorance of public affairs. It’s so vast that it makes the State of Alaska look small. As for writing a book, former Miss USA, Carrie Prejean, has also written a book. I don’t know which one to read first. Yet, I see a clear path to success for Sarah – and I’m willing to share it. It’s been said that politics is Hollywood for ugly people. What if you’re a pretty, but lousy, politician? Where do you go? Hollywood!

I don’t, by any means, intend to slight Hollywood or to suggest, in any way, that Palin has the intelligence, training or gift to be an actor. I’m saying great screen careers have had humbler beginnings. For instance, picture Sarah Palin as a cheerleader. To help you, look at her picture on the cover of this week’s (11/23) Newsweek magazine. See the way she’s posing? (“Contrapposto” in art historical terms.) Give her a pleated skirt, two pom poms and a letter sweater. Perfect, right? Not in a wholesome, family entertainment way, either. The movie I have in mind is a low comedy of the leering sort. The kind that “Joe Sixpack” rents without telling his eighteen-year-old son, who’s also renting it. Imagine what one of Palin’s well-practiced winks could do under the circumstances.

If she’s ambitious (this is Sarah Palin we’re talking about) she will no doubt convince some producer to put her in a more prestigious film. A restoration comedy, for instance. “School For Scandal” only it’s been renamed it, “School for Rogues.” Remember, we’re not looking for artistic perfection. It’s a vehicle – lots of close-ups. Picture in your mind, Sarah Palin with bare shoulders, hair up in curls, blushing behind a fan. Every red-blooded Sheridan fan will be there the first day.

Finally, she’s ready for a big, starring role – Cleopatra. Not in a cheesy epic like the one with Elizabeth Taylor. I see a more kittenish Queen of the Nile - like Vivien Leigh in the 1945 film version of George Bernard Shaw’s “Caesar and Cleopatra.” (Okay, we’ve left reality, but stay with me.) Sarah Palin in a black pageboy with a golden asp curling around her head, pouting on a chaise longue, lower lip extended teasingly in your direction. But wait, there’s more! The tour de force of this movie – I’m talking hall of fame casting here – is John McCain as Julius Caesar. The gray hair, martial bearing, sly sense of humor – ne plus ultra. And the tension between them is already there. You don’t have to invent it. It’s built in. I’d pay to see that.

Nov 12, 2009

Have Gun, Will Shargel.

Time: The Near Future.

Place: Midtown Manhattan.

The office of Gerald Shargel, a prominent criminal defense attorney.The walls are covered with shelf after shelf of handsomely bound legal volumes, numerous awards and degrees and behind his desk (closest to his heart?) framed headlines about his many high-profile cases. Foremost among them, his daring use of an “intellectual property” strategy to successfully defend Robert Joel "Joe" Halderman, a former TV producer charged with blackmailing talk show host, David Letterman. The phone rings, Shargel presses a lighted button and talks into a speaker.

Shargel

Hi, Joe. Good to be free, isn’t it?

Halderman

Yes. Thanks again.

Shargel

Find any TV work?

Halderman

It’s very hard.

Shargel

Just be patient. People have a short memory.

Halderman

Except when you owe them money.

Shargel

Don’t do anything rash, okay?

Halderman

Define “rash.”

Shargel

I had a feeling this wasn't a social call.

Halderman

I tried to sell another screenplay.

Shargel

Why, Joe, why?

Halderman

I need the money. Especially, after paying you.

Shargel

I know, but not Letterman.

Halderman

Listen to me! It wasn't Letterman.

Shargel

Then who?

Halderman

The man who owns a bodega at Convent Avenue and 131 St.

Shargel

Why him?

Halderman

It’s the story of a storeowner at that very location who survives a robbery by quickly and quietly handing over all the money in his register.

Shargel

Did he buy it?

Halderman

No, he tried to sell me his screenplay about a holdup man who gets shot because the storeowner keeps a large, loaded gun under the counter. I say, “That’s a pretty flimsy premise for a whole movie.” He says, “It’s been tested. They love it in Harlem.” At this point in the negotiations, I stick my gun under his chin and say, “This is ‘can’t miss’ material.”

Shargel

Wait. Hold on. Stop right there. I’m getting the sense that this is no longer an “intellectual property” issue.

Halderman

Oh, we passed that a long time ago.

Shargel

Wish I could help you, Joe, but I don't have a free second. Since winning your case, I’ve been deluged with offers. More than I could ever take. I’m already overcommitted.

Halderman

You mean you won’t help me?

Shargel

I can’t, but I will give you a sound bit of advice.

Halderman

Anything. Please. I’m desperate.

Shargel

You don’t need a lawyer, you need an agent.

Nov 10, 2009

Christmas Charnel.

Not even on the Hebrew or Chinese calendars is it Christmas yet - or close. So why are we being assaulted by Christmas-related advertising, events and promotions? You can whine all you want about the bad economy, but that doesn’t excuse extending the holiday season by a month. True, no one is shocked anymore by Christmas ads appearing before Thanksgiving. They’re as unwelcome, yet predictable, as the Swine Flu. Starting them on November first, however is grotesquely commercial, brazenly offensive and an abuse of our patience. What’s more, it’s bound to be ineffective. If you start your Christmas-related advertising the first week of November, people will be sick of it by the second week. Especially if, in this bad economy, you’re too cheap to produce a lot of different ads. The media companies won’t complain, you’re all they need for a happy holiday, but it gives consumers six weeks to ignore your carefully crafted seasonal marketing. It may even provoke a backlash. I don’t advocate that, of course, but . . . if some early advertisers were boiled in their own puddings and had stakes of holly driven through their hearts - not all of them, just a representative sampling - I think it would send a message, a holiday message, to the rest: don’t be a ho, ho, ho.