OBAMACARE FACES CAPTAIN KANGAROO COURT.

Bob Keeshan! Thou should'st be living at this hour: Congress has need of thee: it is a pen of ignorant toddlers.

     Mr. Keeshan was for thirty years a children's television host named Captain Kangaroo. Wearing a blue uniform and a neat, grey mustache, he kept a generation of boomers quiet and well-behaved for an hour while they watched his show. Mr. Keeshan is gone, but his mustache lives on. I saw it on TV recently. It (or a close likeness) squats beneath the snout of Rep. David McKinley (R. West Virginia). I noticed it during TV coverage of a congressional hearing into the flawed roll-out of the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare. The irony is that it was on a congressional Republican, who was behaving worse than a spoiled child.

     At the hearing by the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Thursday, 10/24, Rep. McKinley demanded an apology from four government contractors who worked on the trouble-plagued Obamacare website. "I haven't heard one of you apologize to the American public . . . for problems associated with not having this thing ready. Are apologies not in order?"

     No, they aren't, you fatuous booby. Not until you apologize for shutting down the U.S government. How dare you ask for an apology when you cost taxpayers billions of dollars for no reason. You didn't even apologize to fellow Republicans for embarrassing them because you got nothing in return for this bizarre stunt.

     Worse, according to The United Health Foundation, David McKinley represents a state with a crushing need for Obamacare. West Virginia ranks forty-ninth in the health of its citizens as measured by obesity, heart disease and diabetes. Its only competition is Mississippi and, sometimes, Louisiana. The Mountain State, however, is second to none when it comes to missing teeth among its elderly. Half of them have no teeth at all. What's more, the region is, shall we say, economically distressed, so the need for low-cost healthcare is acute. Yet, their Congressman is doing his best to make sure it isn't available. Instead, David McKinley is whining, pouting and petulantly demanding an apology because the Obamacare website isn't ready on schedule. 

     The real Captain Kangaroo would know what to do with this brat. He'd put him over his knee - and not to take his temperature.

THE LAUGHS MENAGERIE.

    The Glass Menagerie by Tennessee Williams may be a classic of the American theater, but it could be funnier. It works perfectly as a tragedy, but is only a few, small changes away from being a comedy. Perhaps a great one.

     The play begins with a close, immediate family living together at home in St. Louis. There's a doting mother and a daughter with 
romantic problems. Right there, it could be Meet Me In St. Louis (1944). The only thing missing is Judy Garland's heart beating like a trolley bell. I'll go further and suggest that Tennessee Williams was a big Judy Garland fan. (I have no proof, but you see where I'm going.) Williams, of course, went in a different direction. A fatherless family - living in reduced circumstances - in St. Louis - during The Depression. Such concentrated misery that, among playwrights, it's known as, "The Quadruple Bypass."

     Still, dark and foreboding as this play seems, there are laughs to be mined here. Take Laura, the fragile, acutely shy daughter with a limp. She finds human company so intolerable that a class at the local business college overwhelms her. How will she ever find someone to care for her the way she cares for her tiny glass animals? If her name was Elizabeth Barrett and she lived on Wimpole Street, a handsome, young poet named Robert Browning would rescue her from her stern parent and they would live happily ever after. 

     Okay, not laugh out loud, but a romantic comedy nonetheless. It certainly worked for Rudolph Besier in his play, The Barrets of Wimpole Street. Unfortun-ately, the only poet in Laura's life is her brother, Tom, an aspiring writer, who works in a warehouse. Not being one of those poets with great career prospects and reserves of personal strength, his rescuing her is unlikely.

     Tom, sensitive as well as poetic, feels very guilty about not being able to save his sister. It's not, however, his only source of guilt or the only way in which he is being tortured. Standing head and shoulders above his sister is his mother, Amanda. Abandoned by her husband, Amanda is wedded to her past. A not inconsiderable past as she never tires of reminding us.

        Amanda was no mere southern belle, she was the southern belle exercising her whim of iron on an endless stream of obeisant gentleman callers. Now, though, all the whim is gone and her children must contend with the iron. They react differently. Laura is pushed so far in that her voice is barely an echo. Tom is pushed violently away, yet being the only man in his mother's life, she refuses to let go. She won't let him grow up, either, lest he become like his old man. No wonder Tom feels trapped and has to go out every night.

     Not comic gold, I'll grant you, but not beyond hope. There is lightness at the end of the tunnel. Hidden in the midst of all of life's worst situations is a door into a secret garden of guffaws: it's called being Jewish. Not that Tennessee was Jewish, his father was a minister. (I know, I know, you thought he worked for "the phone company." That's only in the play. Although, it depends on how you define "long distance.") All I'm saying is that a Jewish writer would have made this play a comedy. 

     A loving mother with a strong personality and a baleful effect on her children? Not unknown in Jewish culture. Weak or absent fathers? One or a million. Force them to share the same cramped quarters until they drive each other crazy? It's
almost impossible not to laugh. Make them two divorced men sharing a New York apartment and you've got The Odd Couple by Neil Simon. (I'll bet his father wasn't a minister.)

     Please don't list all the sad plays written by Arthur Miller. I don't consider him Jewish. Look at Death of a Salesman. You won't find boys named Biff or Happy in Hebrew school. Loman is not a Jewish name. (Loehmann, maybe.) Besides, what kind of Jew marries Marilyn Monroe except in his dreams. Most inglorious (Pronounced ime-goyish) is that he lived in Connecticut.

     Ultimately, the difference between The Glass Menagerie and, say, The Laughs Menagerie is a difference in outlook. Williams prefers a world lit by candles and the soft glow of nostalgia. As he has Blanche DuBois say in A Streetcar Named Desire, " I don't want realism, I want magic!" It's hard to be funny about that - especially when a feeling of being permanently excluded feeds your poetic yearning. To see the comedy in Amanda Wingfield and her children, you have to accept - not in a resigned, tragic way - you have to embrace a world lit by lightning - when it strikes people on a golf course! Caddyshack (1980) being a hilarious example. 

     Again, there's nothing wrong with the way The Glass Menagerie is written. It's gripping enough without electrocuting someone on stage. Yet, like the funeral guest who keeps insisting that the deceased be given chicken soup, "It couldn't hurt."

WHY DICK CHENEY?

    I saw Dick Cheney on TV last night (10/20). He was being interviewed on 60 Minutes by Dr. Sanjay Gupta. If you watch 60 Minutes, you're old enough to remember Mr. Cheney, the rest of the audience may need some help. Dick Cheney was a blight on our government for thirty years. The last eight of which he served as Vice-President to George W. Bush, a position akin to being wife to Michael Jackson: necessary, but not in the way that you think.

     The interview covered his longevity in life as well as politics. Indeed, his medical history is so unusual that he's co-written a book about it with his cardiologist. (A book whose public-ation - surprise - coincides with his appearance on 60 Minutes.) Dick Cheney has survived five heart attacks, a quadruple bypass, arterial stents, balloon angioplasty, a pacemaker, a left-ventricular assist device, two vascular procedures on his legs and a heart transplant. This man has more zippers than a motorcycle jacket. If you want to know the secret of Cheney's longevity or the significance of his survival, look somewhere else. What you get is Dr. Gupta fanning some weak flames about the Vice-President's fitness to govern while fighting severe heart disease. What he, in turn, gets is the familiar cobra stare and soft, unmodulated voice that Cheney uses to express disdain.

     What I don't understand is: why Dick Cheney? Why should this man, of all people, benefit from decades worth of advances in medicine? You don't have to know him to be outraged. He is such a malign presence that it's obvious from a short interview. Look at the way he uses the reporter's first name to belittle instead of bond. Then there's his eagerness to take credit for "enhanced interrogation techniques" - more commonly known as torture. Specifically, "waterboarding." He even refers to himself as "Darth Vader." Not mockingly, either. This is not a man who reflects. Nor does he engage in reassessment or regret. Lying to get us into war, war as an excuse for torture, torture as a form of national security, Dick Cheney dares you to make him feel guilty. You can't because he can't. He has no inner life.

     Don't get me wrong, I don't begrudge Mr. Cheney - or anyone - their medical care. I leave that to the Tea Party. What bothers me is the vast amounts of expensive, high-quality medical resources that could have been better used. The boundless amounts of sheer luck that - ideally - should have been shared. The question remains: why Dick Cheney? There were nicer people with heart disease who deserved longer lives. 

THE GRASS IS ALWAYS WIENER.

"And maybe if the internet didn't exist. Like, if I was running in 1955? I'd probably get elected mayor."                       
                               - Anthony Wiener

                                                        October, 1955

WALTER WINCHELL: Good evening, Mr. and Mrs. America from border to border and coast to coast and all the ships at sea. Let's go to press. What former New York congressman has been showing his ding-dong to every school girl between here and Poughkeepsie? Not only is this not-a-nudist eyeing the New York Democratic mayoral nomination, he's married to a sloe-eyed beauty with a gold-plated Rolodex and entree to the highest government circles. Stay tuned for more developments in what may be the best scandal of the campaign season - or the wurst!

J.P. MORGAN CHASTENED.

(Sung to the tune of "A Foggy Day In London Town." Music by George Gershwin)

Will Jamie pay

for what he's done?

His bank was fined

thirteen billion.

He viewed the headlines 

with alarm.

The bad news kept coming

and doing more harm.

How long he wondered

will his job last?

His London branch owes

six billion in cash.

Add legal fees 

and double that sum.

Now, the chairman, Mr. Dimon,

looks more like zirconium.

MARLIN STUTZMAN; VOTED "MOST LIKELY TO IMPEDE."

          An otherwise unremarkable congressman, Marlin Stutzman (R-IN) made a remarkable utterance recently. According to NBC’s Frank Thorp, Stutzman said, “We have to get something out of this. And I don’t know what that even is.” He’s not talking about selling his baseball card collection on E-Bay. Or a signed program from a Ted Nugent concert. Rep. Stutzman is referring to shutting down the U.S. government. Four days ago, He and eighty or so of his Republican colleagues in the House refused to agree on an operating budget for the federal government unless the Affordable Care Act was delayed or denied funding. Thus, forcing our nation’s government to halt many of its functions and suspend without pay thousands of employees.

         What’s remarkable is how Mr. Stutzman can act so recklessly and be so honest about it. He’s beyond caring – if he ever did – about his party’s ostensible goal of denying health care to millions of Americans or the shutdown’s undeniable results, mass unemployment among others. Stutzman and his cronies refuse to end the shutdown until they get “something.” At this point in a hostage situation, when the criminal or terrorist is surrounded, but refuses to speak with negotiators, the police usually send for the perpetrator’s mother, wife, or girlfriend to talk with him through a bullhorn. Not applicable. Nor is Rep. Stutzman risking his re-election in a state that reveres Dan Quayle and in 1924, elected a Governor, who was in the Ku Klux Klan. Our only hope may lie in the fate of Rod Blagojevich, former Governor of Illinois. In a phone call wiretapped by the FBI, he stated, as follows, his intention to “sell” the Senate seat vacated by Pres. Obama, “I’ve got this thing and it’s f***ing golden, and, uh, uh, I’m just not giving it up for f***in’ nothing. I’m not gonna do it.” Gov. Blagojevich is currently serving fourteen years for corruption in a federal penitentiary.

         Rep. Stutzman preceded his comment about getting something by saying, “We’re not going to be disrespected.” That’s a common enough sentiment among gang members and an organizing principle of La Cosa Nostra, but rarely is it copped to so bluntly - at least, in public - by U.S. Congressmen. We are beyond political compromise here. The Republicans controlling the House of Representatives clearly won’t end the government shutdown for anything less than ring-kissing. I’ll admit that my experience with the Mafia is long on Corleones and short on actual capos, but an adequate parallel might be found in Carmine “The Snake” Persico, reputed leader of the Colombo crime family. In June, 1987, Persico ordered the murder of William Aronwald, a retired prosecutor who had allegedly been disrespectful. Two hitmen killed Aronwald’s father, George, by mistake. They paid with their lives. Then, the gunmen who killed them were silenced. Persico is currently serving 139 years on charges of murder, extortion, loansharking, racketeering and gambling.

I’m not saying that Mr. Stutzman and his cohorts are criminals or belong in jail. What they’re doing isn’t illegal. It’s – what is it? Immoral? Unethical? Inappropriate? Their behavior falls outside recognizable human conduct, so it’s up to their fellow Republicans to take action. Not John Boehner, of course. That walking Dorito thinks that being crunchy is a sign of strength. I’m talking about the House - and Senate – Republicans who are neither blinded by hate nor motivated by it. I’m not expecting the School of Athens, just some professional legislators who know that

crapping and fall back into it does not constitute a political position.

THE DEVIL WEARS OPRAH.

     Office of  “O Magazine.” Like a hive filled with female drones, it’s     unnaturally busy. Oprah Winfrey, wades in and all activity stops – then starts again, focused on her. The eponymous “O,” she is, quite naturally, the queen bee.

         

     “I’m glad you’re here,” says the editor, “We’ve got a terrific idea for the cover of the next issue. Something very different.”

         

     “Great. ‘Cause I’m running out of hairstyles.”

     The editor is a small, slight woman vibrating with the intensity of an impoverished divorcee making herself up at a cosmetics counter.

         

     “We were thinking - for a change, that’s all - of putting someone else on the cover.”

         

     “Why? Are sales down?”

         

     “No, but maybe we can sell even more.”

         

     “I’m the brand. My name is on the magazine.”

         

     Exactly. What if - keep an open mind - we just have your name on the cover. One issue only – as an experiment.”

         

     “I’ve got a movie out now. You need my picture. What if I wore something different?”

         

     “African?”

         

     “No, really different.”

         

     “Tefillin?”

          

     “Something body conscious. Michael Kors?”

          

     “We don’t want to get too glamorous or we’ll lose our base.”

          

     “How about a wrap dress? That’s a classic – and I have twenty-five that I haven’t worn.”

           

     “What about someone who’s glamorous and accessible?”

         

     “Who?”

         

     “Beyonce.”

         

     “I’m sick of her. She’s everywhere.”

         

     “Just a notion.”

         

     “And I’m sick of the guy she’s married to.”

         

     “Jay Z? He’s very big right now.”

         

     “He’s always big. He ought to lay off the candy bars.”

Oprah turns to the woman closest to her, a striking blonde in her twenties, wearing, to great effect, eight thousand dollars worth of the latest fashions and hiding, with equal success, an education that cost twenty times that.

“Make a note. Send our last ten diets to Jay – what is it?”

“Z.”

“Jay Z.”

“That’s only one issue.”

“Send him ten issues.”

“Think about it,” says the editor to Oprah, “That’s all I ask. Think about Beyonce.”

“Why? She hasn’t made one movie and I’m in the biggest movie of the year.”

“With all due respect, she’s still pretty famous.”

“But I’m the star of Lee . . . Butler’s?

“Child.”

“Lee Butler’s Child? No.”

“Lee Child’s Butler.”

“Lee Child doesn’t have a butler.      He’s lucky to have a cleaning woman. Steven Spielberg has a butler. He probably has ten.”

    “The name of the movie is Lee Child’s The Butler.”

“That’s an awful name. No wonder I can’t remember it.”

“You should write it on your hand.”

“On my ham?”

“On your hand.”

Oprah turns to her blonde assistant. “Note. Make hearing aids incredibly cool. Just in case.”

A stunning brunette in her thirties, laced into a leather dress that fits like     the cover of a baseball, rises from her desk.

“Why don’t we put you both on the cover together,” she proposes.

“Oh, yeah,” replies Oprah, “great idea. And we should both wear the same dress. No? Then why don’t I put my Chanel boots on and kick you all the way back to Vassar?”

The woman sits down as Oprah, the color purple, scans the room for other brave souls. “Any more bright ideas?”     The editor assumes her decisive pose, a matter of jutting her chin out.

“It’s settled. Oprah will be on our next cover. Hair and clothes to be determined.”

J.D. SALINGER: THE PITY PALACE.

          Jerome David Salinger, the famously reclusive author, died in 2010. (“For J.D. Salinger – With Love And Squalor” TFT 1/29/10) Three years later, the documentary, Salinger, directed by Shane Salerno, parts the clouds around his life – and leaves a cloud on his reputation.

Not intentionally, the film is unfailingly positive, but it’s two hours long, so among the hero-worshipping, sensationalism and unanswered questions are a great many facts. Being the stubborn things they are, these facts lead to an inescapable conclusion: J.D. Salinger felt sorry for himself his entire life. Occasionally, he was distracted and, ultimately he replaced his pain with religion, but in addition to his literary contribution - indeed, encompassing it - Jerry Salinger built a house, nay, a palace of self-pity and lived in it to the end.

J.D. Salinger was the sensitive, intelligent, talented son of a wealthy, Park Avenue family. A man about town, he dated beautiful women, notably Oona O’Neil (daughter of Eugene and future wife of Charlie Chaplin.) As a soldier, he took part in the Invasion of Normandy, The Battle of The Bulge and the Liberation of Paris, where he met and made friends with Ernest Hemingway. Salinger’s first and only novel, The Catcher In The Rye, made him famous at the age of thirty-two. That’s a lot of good fortune to overcome, but J.D. was nothing if not determined. Having nursed his adolescent angst into a major work of fiction, he turned a raging case of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder into Nine Stories, a literary reputation and, arguably, a lifestyle. He came by his PTSD honestly, however. As the documentary makes clear (in a manner more akin to hammer throwing than character sketching) Salinger was among the first American soldiers to enter the Dachau concentration camp in 1945 and was very affected by it. 

          Salinger’s precarious mental and emotional state is reflected in three of his best short stories. “A Perfect Day For Bananafish” about a brilliant, but disturbed man who commits suicide. “Teddy” about a brilliant, but disturbed ten-year-old boy who commits homicide and “For Esme – With Love and Squalor” about a brilliant, but disturbed soldier and his relationship with a thirteen-year-old English girl. Although the last one        has no body count, it may be the most unsettling because the girl in question owes more to Ava Gardner as Lady Brett Ashley than, say, Judy Garland as Dorothy.

What distinguishes these stories, apart from their style – economical and concrete like Hemingway, but more flowing and deeply personal in tone – is the overwhelming, almost palpable sympathy he has for his characters. It’s what makes these stories instantly engaging and fondly remembered. Their strength, however, is also their weakness. As no less an author than John Updike said, “Salinger loves his characters more than God loves them.” When you consider that every character in every story, every sensitive loner and highly intelligent, but tormented, individual is J.D. Salinger himself, then, even for a writer, that’s an epic amount of self-regard.

Nine Stories cemented Salinger’s literary reputation because The Catcher In The Rye, for all it’s acclaim - and the director has no trouble finding people, often famous, to acclaim it – is a qualified success. Teenagers will identify completely with Holden Caulfield and think it’s the best book they’ve ever read because it perfectly mimics their intense, shifting emotions in a voice exactly - not close, but dead on - like their own. Adults are more likely to admire the technique, but yearn for a character beside the author’s persona and anything resembling a plot. 

That brings us up to 1953. J.D. Salinger is thirty-four and he lives to be ninety-one. What does he do for the next fifty-seven years? He writes – and publishes - a short story and three novellas: “Franny” (1955) Raise High The Roof Beam, Carpenters” (1955) "Zooey" (1957) and “Seymour: 

An Introduction" (1959). That’s all. “Seymour: An Introduction” was his farewell. At the ripe, old age of forty, Salinger leaves O. Henry’s “Baghdad On The Subway” for “Shangri-La” in the mountains of northern New Hampshire. Not exactly a hardship. The idea of leaving the city for some beautiful, remote location occurs to every Manhattanite around 3.5 times a day. The reality, for J.D., was more humble. Salinger, shows us how dull and ordinary, how utterly unromantic, his house and separate writing studio in Cornish, New Hampshire were. If you were dust you might want to settle there, but they lack what real estate agents call, “everything.” Not that his life there was dull. Mr. Salerno takes great pains (ours, not his) to prove that his subject is not as reclusive as we think.

          J.D. Salinger never lacked for female companionship. He didn’t know any women, I don’t think he could, but he sure knew a lot of girls. (His only relationship with a woman his age, his first marriage, lasted eight months and she may have worked for the Gestapo. Except for her knowledge of torture methods and a taste for decorating with swastikas, that could happen to anyone. Okay, maybe not. Plus, his Jewish parents weren’t thrilled.) Then, while still pining for Oona O’Neill (whom he knew while she was in high school) he meets Jean Miller, who is fourteen (although, she states in the film, they didn’t have sex until she eighteen) Claire Douglas (Radcliffe student and his second wife) and Joyce Maynard, whom he noticed reclining like an eighteen-year-old odalisque on the cover of the New York Times Magazine. (In all fairness, she was hard to miss.) Maynard, in turn, was replaced by Colleen O’Neill, an au pair girl, whom he married and widowed. 

                                                            

            That’s all the light that Salinger sheds on the author’s romantic life. If you want heat, go somewhere else. About the only mildly kinky thing in the movie is how, during her interview, Joyce Maynard is wearing the same watch, too large for her wrist, that she wore on her magazine cover and which reminded Salinger of the watch that Esme wore in his story, “For Esme - With Love and Squalor.” That dizzy feeling is Vertigo (1958).

So much for hero worship, unanswered questions and torrents of facts.What about the sensationalism I promised? It doesn’t amount to much. When the film ends, the director tries to tease us with all the writing Salinger supposedly did and never showed anyone. He claims that Salinger’s personal foundation has copies and will start publishing them, per his instructions, in 2015. There are a lot of reasons not to hold our breath.

J.D. Salinger spent most of his life, easily the second two-thirds or about sixty years, practicing Vedantic Hinduism. Here I must plead ignorance. Everything I know about Hinduism is from the movie, Gunga Din (1939). Assuming that Salinger did not worship the goddess, Kali, he probably took a more austere path. One involving a lot of renunciation. So, he takes the beautiful palace of self-pity that is his life and starts emptying it. No more publishers wanting things or, worse, depending on him. No more crappy editors at The New Yorker, who insist on having standards that aren’t his own. No more constant distraction by wives, girlfriends and, oh yeah, those two children he had with his second wife. Harsh and unsparing, I’ll grant you, but there are two obvious benefits. One is that, like all writers, he loves the sound of his own voice and what echoes better than an empty house? The other is serenity and who needs more goddamned serenity than Jerome David Salinger?

It doesn’t guarantee good literature, though. I’ll give you The Razor’s Edge (1944) by W. Somerset Maugham, but after that the pickings get kind of slim. What’s more, Maugham was working with editors, publishers and reviewers. He wasn’t sitting around talking to himself, laughing and kissing his hand. So, when Shane Salerno rises to his full, sensationalist crouch and beats the drum for more stories about the brilliant, but disturbed Glass family, a WWII novella about a soldier exactly like J.D. Salinger and a “manual” of stories about Vedanta, forgive me if I don’t throw my hands in the air and shout, “Hallelujah.” Instead, I’ll cover my ears and chant, “Om my god.” 

SYRIA: A LITTLE LEARNING IS A DANGEROUS FOREIGN POLICY.

A lot of half-smart objections have been raised about our country’s possible military involvement in Syria. What are our goals, our strategies and our chances of success? Is it worth the expense in money and lives and what about the risk of unintended consequences? They’re half-smart because they’re not really objections. They’re valid questions that should be asked - and answered - before our government takes action, but do not, by themselves, constitute a policy. They’re not even opinions. They are the beginning of a process, not the end result. They’re half-smart because the people making these objections think they’ve learned something from our wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but if they’ve learned anything, it’s “Isolationism.”

        Bashar al-Assad, President of Syria, is using chemical weapons against civilians. He is maiming and killing thousands of innocent people, hundreds of them children and all of them fellow Syrians. He is committing crimes against humanity and daring, not only the opposing forces within his country, but the world to stop him.

Some people aren’t satisfied by the evidence against him, they want to  be convinced before they do anything. If you can’t see that excuse coming a mile away, you’re making it. Didn’t we learn anything in Iraq? Yes, that weapons of mass destruction demand a response, but make sure they’re real.

         How about in Afghanistan? We learned two things: never invade a country that has “Graveyard of Empires” on its license plates and if you’re searching for Osama Bin Laden there, make sure he isn’t relaxing in Pakistan, watching “Gossip Girl” by satellite. None of which applies to Bashar al-Assad using poison gas against his own people.

Isn’t the U.S. tired of military actions that could lead to long, expensive, frustrating wars? Can we even afford one at this point? Wouldn’t that money be better spent fighting the threat of universal healthcare in this country? Yes, all true – and not for the first time.

It was true before the Second World War as well. Americans, a lot of them, were so horrified by the First World War that they would do anything to avoid another. What’s more, it was the Great Depression, so their economy was a lot worse than ours. Even the threat of universal healthcare was greater - part of a program called The New Deal. Yet our country joined the fight against Hitler and few people today think that was bad idea.

Bashar al-Assad, like Hitler, should be stopped before he commits more crimes against humanity. Doing nothing is worse than half-smart. It’s half-human. 

"BLANCHE DUBOIS. IT MEANS WHITE WOODY.'

     With Blue Jasmine (2013) writer and director Woody Allen takes a streetcar named Desire and gets off at Elysian Fields. Not movie heaven exactly, but close enough for  his fans.

It’s the story of a desperate, attractive and desperately attractive woman named Jasmine (Cate Blanchett) who - facing the loss of her wealth, social status and most of her marbles - throws herself into the not exactly waiting arms of her half-sister, Ginger (Sally Hawkins) and Ginger’s lout-ish fiancée, Chili (Bobby Cannevale).  Ginger is a simple, generous and forgiving soul, but - a supermarket cashier – she hasn’t a nickel to spare. Chili is violent, territorial and intensely suspicious of this woman who invades what is essentially his home and threatens to stay.  Jasmine’s one, slim chance for happiness lies with the debonair diplomat, Dwight (Peter Sarsgaard) who only sees her beauty and sophistication, not the emotional baggage stretching from San Francisco to New York. 

Of course, Blue Jasmine isn’t a total gloss on Streetcar. The character of Jasmine, for instance, is not sympathetic like Blanche DuBois. She is brittle - not fragile, snobbish, entitled and seems to have no interior life, much less a poetic sensibility. There is also the suggestion - in a Bernie Madoff-like subplot involving Jasmine’s husband, Hal (Alec Baldwin) –  that she is much less a victim than she would appear. 

Will Ginger catch her falling sister, will Chili make sure she hits bottom or will Jasmine and Dwight live happily ever after?  Anyone who’s seen Tennessee William’s play and movie, A Streetcar Named Desire, can supply their own spoiler alert. Otherwise, it’s safe to say that Jasmine does not come to a happy end. 

Cate Blanchett, however, can look forward to a very happy award season. They may even have to invent some new ones for her performance.The whole cast distinguishes themselves, especially Sally Hawkins, who is  a convincingly good person without being simpering or insincere. 

      Blue Jasmine lets Woody Allen fans enjoy daytime in New York and San Francisco as well as midnight in Paris. For everyone else, it’s an engaging – though, not completely satisfying  - story and a streetcar ride to actor heaven.

"IN THE HEAT OF THE (VOTING) RIGHTS" STARRING THE SUPREME COURT.

It’s been a while since men in long robes came to the aid of a struggling South. Who would have thought that - in 2013 - the Supreme Court would take on that role? That is, the Supreme Court as a group.

On Tuesday, June 25, The Supreme Court gutted the Voting Right Act of 1965, allowing nine states, mostly Southern, to change their election laws without federal approval. The vote was 5-4, splitting along idealogical lines with the conservative wing of the Court prevailing. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. claims, “Our country has changed. While any racial discrimination in voting is too much, Congress must ensure that the legislation it passes to remedy that problem speaks to current conditions.”

         The true and only purpose for invalidating the Voting Rights of 1965 is to allow discrimination against minority voters. Any doubt was removed two hours after the decision was made public when the State of Texas announced it would immediately commence both redistricting – that is, gerrymandering - and a strict voter I.D. program. Now, thanks to the Supreme Court, Texas will have a wall around the ballot box as well as along the border with Mexico.

Not only is the Court’s attempt at justifying discrimination a lie, it’s not even a good lie. Witness the quote above. What Chief Justice Roberts says is that a law that’s outlived its usefulness is worse than voter discrimination. Compare it with an exactly parallel construction used by schoolgirls around the world: “She’s sweet, but she’s slept with the whole football team.” Even if it was a good lie, it would have been contradicted the very next day when Chief Justice Roberts voted against striking down the Defense of Marriage Act – a law clearly out of touch with the current conditions in a changing country.

         What are those current conditions, anyway? Where is the evidence that voter discrimination no longer exists in the South? Opponents of the voting rights law are quick to point out the abundance of black officials at every level of government - including President Obama. All of whom must have been elected by black people. What else could explain it? A white person wouldn’t vote for a black candidate, would they?

         By working hand-in-hand with the kind of dressed-up Snopeses that clutter Southern legislatures, the Supreme Court is helping renew the conditions that made the Voting Rights Act necessary in the first place. They might as well erect a statue to Robert Shelton on The Mall, right next to the one of Martin Luther King Jr. Who is Robert Shelton? He was Imperial Wizard back in the days before Harry Potter, when the title inspired more shock than awe.

SUPREME COURT TAKES TWO STEPS DOWN THE AISLE.

          The Supreme Court ruled today (6/26) that married same-sex couples were entitled to federal benefits and, by refusing to hear a case from California, effectively sanctioned same-sex marriages there. The decision was 5-4 with Justice Anthony M. Kennedy writing the majority opinion. The Defense of Marriage Act, he wrote, was invalid because it injured and disparaged same-sex couples, thereby denying them equal protection under marriage law and violating the Fifth Amendment. The court’s four liberal-leaning justices joined him in this courageous and far-reaching decision.

         DOMA is the legacy of President Bill Clinton and was signed into law by him in 1996. What he was thinking at the time is anyone’s guess, but a good guess would be political compromise. As a centrist mistaken for a liberal and acting like a conservative, he came as close as any President to pleasing everyone or, as Abraham Lincoln put it, fooling all the people all the time. So, throwing gays and lesbians under the bus for some imagined future gain would be just his cup of bacon fat. Also, it must be said that - as an individual - Bill Clinton never acted as if defense of marriage was a high priority.

         The Supreme Court’s second decision - actually, non-decision - about gay rights concerned an attempt to overturn an Appellate Court reversal of California’s ban on same-sex marriage. By refusing to hear the case, the appellate decision remains in effect, removing any legal obstacles to same-sex marriage in California. It’s tempting, of course, to read into the court's refusal. Does it mean tacit approval of the appellate ruling, was the case rejected on a technicality or is it their way of saying, “Hey, it’s Summer! We want to get on the links at Augusta.”

         Perhaps the most surprising aspect of both rulings is how rarely we expect wisdom from the Supreme Court and how shocked we are when justice is served by people called Justices.

Bush and Marshall: Twilight Double-Header

Two figures from the recent past command our attention again: George W. Bush and Anthony Marshall. On April 25, 2013, the 43rd President stepped from the shadows to dedicate his official Presidential library in Dallas. Anthony Marshall, eighty-nine-year-old son of famed heiress and philanthropist, Brooke Astor, having exhausted all appeals of his 2009 conviction for mulcting his mother out of millions while she was addled from Alzheimer’s, reports to jail this Friday to begin serving a one-to-three year sentence. The following are a repeat of our 2009 visit with George W. and Laura Bush and an update on Anthony Marshall.

          BUSH ON A HOT TIN ROOF.

A brisk, October morning in 2009. George and Laura Bush sit on the covered terrace of their house in the exclusive Preston Hollow neighborhood of North Dallas. Laura wears a dressing gown over tailored silk pajamas and drinks tea out of a silver service. George wears a knee-length Texas Rangers jersey. For breakfast, he’s having an RC and a moon pie.

GEORGE

Damn. That guy gets everything.

LAURA

Who, George?

GEORGE

Obama. He just got the Nobel Peace Prize.

LAURA

Are you sure?

GEORGE

They just announced it.

LAURA

But he hasn’t done anything.

GEORGE

Exactly. I’m President for eight years and what do I get?

LAURA

Did you want the Nobel Prize?

GEORGE

No, but a little recognition would be nice.

LAURA

We came here so we wouldn’t be recognized - by the wrong people.

GEORGE

You make it sound like we’re hiding.

LAURA

Relaxing.

GEORGE

It’s hard to relax when you’re humiliated on a worldwide scale.

LAURA

Don’t take it so personally.

GEORGE

It has to be personal. First, Gore gets it. Then, the very next one goes to Obama. They don’t even wait eight years. They want to make it very clear that George W.  isn’t getting one. 

LAURA

If you wanted a Nobel Prize, you should have started a long time ago.

GEORGE

I’m not making claims, but a little thanks – is that so bad?  A thank you for being President.

LAURA

I keep telling you, George, don’t expect to be thanked. Just be wonderfully surprised when it happens.

GEORGE

I’ll be surprised all right.

LAURA

Try to relax, dear – and don’t do anything foolish.

GEORGE

You mean go off the wagon?

LAURA

Yes.

GEORGE

It’s tempting.

     LAURA

Don’t give in. 

GEORGE

Sometimes I really miss drinking.

LAURA

Giving up drinking is the best thing you’ve ever done.

    GEORGE

Huh?

LAURA

In a personal way. That and giving up drugs.

GEORGE

I always miss them. Just as well, though. Being President would have killed me if I was snorting. Three days would have done it.

LAURA

And I would regret that.

GEORGE

Really?

LAURA

Deeply and forever.

GEORGE

Sometimes I don’t think so.

LAURA

What on earth could you mean?

GEORGE

You’ve been very critical since I left office. Not always directly, but in subtle ways.

LAURA

I’ve been honest with you, George. You should appreciate that. I can finally say what I think without worrying about protecting your image. 

GEORGE

A little protection is okay.  I could stand you protecting me. 

LAURA

I protect my memory of you – and that isn’t easy.

GEORGE

I know I’m going to regret this (He steadies himself by grabbing the table)

Why not?

LAURA

I remember when you were young, hot and a little dangerous.

GEORGE

(Breathes deeply and squares his shoulders) And now?

LAURA

I shouldn’t say.

GEORGE

You can’t stop now. The horse has left the station.

LAURA

Now, you’re old, cold and only dangerous when you use power tools.

GEORGE

Thanks a goddamned bunch, Laura. That really makes my morning. Thanks a whole lot. That really puts a cherry on it.

                    (George gets up to leave)

LAURA

Where are you going?

GEORGE

To clear some brush.

LAURA

We’re in Dallas, we don’t have brush.

GEORGE

Then I’m going to Crawford.

LAURA

George!

GEORGE

Don’t go? You take it all back and want me to stay?

LAURA

No, don’t use power tools.

(George shakes his head and mutters as he leaves.)

GEORGE

Of all the goddamned mornings.

______________________________________________________

              

              THE MARSHALL FALCON.

A sultry, June morning in 2013. Anthony Marshall, 89, and his wife, Charlene, 68, stand facing each other in the parlor of their seventeen-room Park Avenue duplex. The atmosphere is so thick with depression that even the electric fan is shaking its head “no.” Mr. Marshall has spent the last seven years fighting his arrest and appealing his conviction on eighteen counts of Grand Larceny and Conspiracy to Defraud. He plundered the estate of his mother, 105-year-old heiress and philanthropist, Brooke Astor, while she was helpless from Alzheimer’s disease. In three days, he must report to prison to begin serving his one-to-three year sentence. With his drooping eyes and sagging jowls, Marshal looks like a bloodhound in a bespoke suit. Charlene, the blond limpet he married in 1992, looks like Liz Smith from hell.

CHARLENE

If you get a good break, you’ll be out of Tehachapi in a couple of years.

ANTHONY

Where?

CHARLENE

Tehachapi.

ANTHONY

Is that near Kykuit?

CHARLENE

I hope they don’t hang you, precious, by that sweet neck.

ANTHONY

This wasn’t a capital crime. The only hanging I’ll be doing is around.

CHARLENE

The chances are you’ll serve the full sentence. If you’re a good boy, you’ll get out in less. I can’t wait that long.

ANTHONY

Don’t, Charlene. Don’t say that even in fun. I was frightened for a minute. I really thought . . . You do such wild and unpredictable things.

CHARLENE

You’re taking the fall - and I’m taking a vacation. Liposuction here, botox there and Charlene’s got her groove back.

ANTHONY

You’ve been playing with me . . . You didn’t care at all. You don’t love me.

CHARLENE

I won’t play the sap for you.

ANTHONY

You know in your heart, In spite of everything I’ve done, I love you.

CHARLENE

I don’t care who loves who. I won’t play the sap. I won’t follow in Morrissey’s and I don’t know how many others’ footsteps.

ANTHONY

Morrissey was our lawyer. He followed in our footsteps.

CHARLENE

You robbed your mother and you’re going over for it.  

ANTHONY

It was your idea!

CHARLENE

This won’t do any good. You’ll never understand me, but I’ll try once and then give up. I was already old when I met you. Now, I’m over the hill. My chances of finding another husband are slim to none. I can’t waste any of them waiting for you.

ANTHONY

But I won’t last in prison. You know that. Not even a year.

CHARLENE

Your mother lived to be one hundred and five under worse conditions.

ANTHONY

The conditions were your idea.

CHARLENE

The only reason I should wait is maybe you love me and maybe I love you.

ANTHONY

You know whether you love me or not. 

CHARLENE

Maybe I do. I’ll have some rotten nights after they send you up the river, but that’ll pass.

ANTHONY

If my mother had died when she should have, thirty years ago, would you still feel this way?

CHARLENE

A lot more money would have been one more thing on your side of the scales.

(Anthony takes a fireplace poker and plants it in Charlene’s forehead. Then pours himself five fingers of 100-year old cognac, drinks and calls his new lawyer. Morrissey,unfortunately, will be joining him in jail.)