You can either buy fertilizer or get it free. Evan Bayh, two-term Democratic Senator from Indiana, just gave us a steaming pile of the free kind. On Monday, February 15th, he announced that he was retiring from the Senate.There could a worse time to do that, but it isn’t likely. His President, party and country need all the Democratic votes they can get – now! Yet, what reason did he give? That extreme partisanship has made it impossible for Congress to accomplish anything. He didn’t give examples, but he doesn’t have to. Evan Bayh accomplished nothing during his twelve years in the Senate.
Does Sen. Bayh take any blame for that himself? No, instead he takes the vulgar popular notion of “extreme partisanship” and tries to hide behind it. What is he hiding? It’s obviously possible for someone named Bayh to achieve great things in the Senate, his father proved that. Holding the same seat as his son from 1963-1981, Sen. Birch Bayh was principal architect of the 25th and 26th Amendments to the Constitution. He was principal Senate sponsor of the Equal rights Amendment, which passed both houses of Congress, but wasn’t ratified by the states and was a major force in passing Title IX to the Higher Education Act, which gave women equal opportunities in school sports. A different time, you say? Yes, the late Sixties and early Seventies were a peaceful time in this country. No dissension at all. Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon really brought the nation together.
Does Evan Bayh blame congressional Republicans for consistent party-line voting, filibustering and other tactics intended to obstruct? No. Does he, at least, point the finger at House Minority Leader, John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell, the Guillain and Barre of creeping congressional paralysis? No, because then he would be “partisan.”
What’s wrong with being “partisan” anyway? The two parties should be different. The more alike they are, the worse for everyone. Attacking the other party is healthy, defeating them is an obligation. When the other party blocks legislation for their own selfish reasons, you don’t blame “partisanship,” you blame them. Being “bipartisan” is not some mysterious goal. It won’t usher in the Millenium. Being “bipartisan” is simply the result of not being a selfish pig. When politicians think about what’s good for other people, things get done.
Evan Bayh doesn’t even think about what’s good for other politicians. Not only has he betrayed every Democratic colleague at the national level, up to and including the President, he’s screwed the ones in his home state of Indiana, too. By announcing his retirement on Monday, none of them had time to qualify for the primary. Now, the Democratic nominee will be chosen by the state party committee. He didn’t learn that kind of behavior from his father. Birch Bayh is the man who pulled Teddy Kennedy from the flaming wreckage of a plane crash in 1964. So, not only is he a hero for saving Teddy’s life, he can lay claim to the next forty-five years of Kennedy’s career in the Senate, too.
What does Evan Bayh plan to do once he’s out of office? Be a lobbyist? Not after burning all his Democratic bridges. Run for Governor of Indiana? Been there, done that - twice. Granting him the full measure of self-delusion common to all politicians, he may want to run for President. But why? Even a conservative Democrat is too liberal for the Republicans. A third party? Good luck. That leaves Joe Lieberman, the Independent who looks like a donkey, but votes like an ass.
A strong indictment that is well-deserved. On one level, Bayh is no great loss to the party. The Nov. election reflected that voters demanded reform and innovative solutions, and all Bayh ever did was counsel his party to moderate its positions. He is a Dem only because "D" comes before "R" in the alphabet. More disturbing is the notion introduced by Sarah Palin, and now endorsed by Bayh (bye, bye?)that serving in public office is a hindrance, and that great leaders, presumably, such as Palin and Bayh, can accomplish more for the nation when freed from the encumbrance of government. It's a ridiculous, cynical concept that an individual who can't vote to implement govt. policies has more power than someone in elected office who can. It's a smokescreen that frees these clowns from ethics rules to pad their bank accounts with paid appearances and speeches, and increase their exposure with appearances on cable & network talk shows, so that they can mount a run for the presidency as political "outsiders." So the Dems will have to make do with an 18-seat majority; it's not as if they were able to get anything done with a 20-seat advantage. Bye, bye Bayh--enjoy yourself in Indianapolis (a Native American term meaning "oblivion").
ReplyDeleteHere speaks one of us. The point about Palin is particularly well taken.
ReplyDelete